But most importantly of all, I’ve spent the last decade of my life, playing thousands of hours of numerous Call of Duty titles, while always placing within the top 3 players on the server without fail.Įven when the times were tough, and Activision was releasing one futuristic title after another, I still stuck by the series, and have spent countless hours playing Infinite Warfare, which many have looked down upon. In Overtwatch, I can easily get in the very least to the diamond rank without little to no effort, while playing as the main DPS. Within The Beatles Rockband, I still hold numerous top 100 spots for songs such as Dig a Pony, and Her Majesty. I personally, feel more than confident when reviewing each and every single game, simply because I’ve played them all, to a proficient, and in some cases advanced level. And multiple occasions, gamers world order have dismissed reviews of sites such as Polygon, or Gamespot, due to their lack of general knowledge, implicit bias, and most importantly lack of any skill in relation to the game they were reviewing.
For that reason alone Call of Duty: World at War stands as the best World War II shooter to date.When it comes to judging reviewer’s credibility, the public doesn’t look at his ability to write, or compose coherent arguments for and against, but at how suitable is he or she, to judge the game at hand due to their skill, and knowledge of the franchise and/or genre. Until then, World at War continues the same formula that has been working and keeping gamers up for long nights of gameplay since the release of Call of Duty 4. I have every reason to believe that they will live up to this.
In a year from now, when the next Call of Duty will no doubt get released, I hope to expect something from Infinity Ward that is different from the current formula.
With what could be described as the most well rounded multi-player experience ever, Call of Duty: World at War inherits a tested game engine and a lot of goodwill from gamers. While there are basic modifications that have to do with a change in time period, World at War uses the same engine as Call of Duty 4, making gameplay nearly identical. Call of Duty: World at War is an outstanding game and one of the years best shooter experiences.Ĭall of Duty: World at War picks up where Call of Duty 4 left off. Tack on support for co-op multiplayer in campaigns and the deadly zombie mini-game and you have enough action to keep you busy for some time. Of course you would have to be a fool not to want to investigate the flawless online capabilities of World at War which build upon the foundation of Call of Duty 4, one of last years best online shooters. Even if you’re not going to jump online, World at War is worth a look. The ultra-smooth controls, immersive story elements and distinct differences from mission to mission keep World at War feeling fresh and always fun. Treyarch has fully redeemed themselves for all the doubters with what could be considered the best Call of Duty of all time. In all its blazing glory, Call of Duty: World at War powers up with the Call of Duty 4 engine to push the boundaries of the franchise.
0 kommentar(er)
